Search for posts by Doofiegirl

Stu writes for freedom : Support The First Amendment Defense Act (H. R. 2802) - Sent to Rep. Peter Welch

Dear Representative Welch,

Responding to the Supreme Court ruling last month legalizing same-sex
marriage, Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) has introduced the First Amendment
Defense Act (FADA, H. R. 2802). This bill is a religious-freedom bill
banning the federal government from punishing churches, charities, and
private schools for actions in opposition to same-sex marriage. For
example, under FADA the government could not legally revoke the tax
exempt status of churches that refuse to perform same-sex weddings
because of their religious beliefs, nor could it could not deny federal
grants or contracts to individuals or institutions (such as food banks
or adoption agencies) that don't believe in same-sex marriage. And it
will protect Christian radio and television stations that are licensed
by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to use the public
airwaves (already there are people urging the FCC to revoke these
licenses). Finally, it would put an end to the flagrant violation of
business owner rights by barring lawsuits and criminal charges against
individuals that refuse to endorse homosexual marriage via their work
product (e.g., wedding photographers, custom cake makers, floral
arrangers, etc.).

Many Republicans "say" they hope to pass FADA before they head home and
face constituents at August town halls, but they need to be prodded to
actually get moving. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who
controls the House floor schedule, has given no indication he'll
schedule a vote in the remaining three weeks before the House leaves
town for the long August recess. This leads me to believe that
rank-and-file Republicans are lying about their commitment to passing FADA.

The recent Supreme Court decision mandating State recognition of
homosexual "marriage" (Obergefell v. Hodges) is a violation of
federalism. Nowhere in Article 1, Section 8 does the Constitution grant
the federal government the enumerated power to promulgate domestic
social law. Since such power is not Constitutionally denied to the
States, it is the State legislatures that Constitutionally have sole
legal jurisdiction over the definition of marriage. Note that this is
absolutely not a civil rights issue calling for federal nullification of
State law - sexual orientation is neither immutable nor a birth
condition, and thus is outside the purview of federal special class law
and the Civil Rights Act.

Obergefell v. Hodges is a Constitutional abomination that I suspect many
States will nullify over time via State Sovereignty Acts. In the
interim, we need federal conscience protections from Congress to protect
individuals, businesses, churches, charities, schools, advocacy groups,
and media outlets from the inevitable resulting mass erosion of First
Amendment rights of people and organizations of faith. The radical
Homosexual Lobby wants much more than the right to marry (a privilege
which it doesn't even legally have unless the operant State legislature
grants it) - they are demanding that individuals and organizations of
faith support and implicitly endorse gay marriage, under threat of
severe civil and criminal penalties. This is a violation of First
Amendment freedom of speech and expression that as a society we cannot
tolerate.

Your position on whether or not Vermont should permit gay marriage is
not the issue here. The issue is simply this - First Amendment freedoms
of speech, expression, and religion are not confined to the home and the
church. Our Founders in fact expressly intended that all American law
comport with Biblical ethical doctrine, making the Bible higher in
American legal precedence than the Constitution and even the Declaration
of Independence. "Separation of church and State" (the Constitution's
Establishment Clause) was constructionistly intended only to protect the
church from the state - there was never any originalist intent that it
protect the state from the church. Hence modern secular humanist
arguments that religion has no place in the public squares of commerce
and government have no factual basis in Constitutional law,
constructionistly interpreted - such beliefs are merely revisionist
"hope items" of radical left wing voters and government officials.

For all the reasons above, I respectfully request that you cosponsor the
First Amendment Defense Act (H. R. 2802), as well as push as hard as you
can on Majority Leader McCarthy to bring FADA up for a House floor vote
before the August recess. FADA is a desperately needed interim measure
to protect First Amendment rights until the States have enough time to
enact nullification laws interposing against Obergefell v. Hodges.

In Liberty,

Stu asks that we send this to our senators

Dear xxx,

The nuclear deal reached with Iran is very bad. Iran can still enrich
uranium. It can keep centrifuges in a "bunker buster" proof vault.
Critical sanctions will be lifted, and Iran still insists that Israel be
destroyed. As Prime Minister Netanyahu warned, nothing in these terms
prevents Iran from getting the atomic bomb. In fact, these terms ensure
that Iran will get the bomb. This deal is an absolute non-starter, and
Iran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon.

As I look at the deal the Obama Administration made with Iran, one key
fact jumps out - absolutely nothing has changed about Iran's objectives
during the course of these negotiations. Iranian leaders still chant
"Death to America, Death to Israel," and they still actively support
terrorism against the U.S., Israel, and our allies. These people aim to
kill as many Americans and Israelis as possible. When someone says they
want to kill you, believe them. For what conceivable reason would they
say that unless they meant it?

Iran is utterly desperate to have sanctions lifted. They want to sell
oil, they want to buy arms, including the technology to build missiles
that can hit Israel and Europe, and they want billions in frozen assets
returned - assets they will turn around and use to fund terrorism around
the world. What has changed, though, is that Iran has learned the
lessons of Libya, Iraq, and North Korea. Libya and Iraq both had
nuclear programs at one time. When they ceased to have those programs,
they were vulnerable to attack. Now Muammar Qaddafi and Saddam Hussein
are dead. North Korea, when faced with the same pressure, made a deal
and then broke it. Now North Korea has nuclear weapons, and the Kim
family remains in power. Iran has learned this lesson. The West has not.

But this deal isn't done yet. Congress still has to vote on it, and
with 67 votes in the Senate, we can stop it. That means there are
concrete, real actions you can take to help stop Iran from getting a
nuclear weapon.

The Iran deal is a bad deal. You must oppose this terrible deal. We are
currently contemplating unfreezing billions of dollars in assets, and
lifting trade sanctions, in exchange for NOTHING. No surprise
inspections at secret facilities, no permanent promise of uranium
enrichment caps, no limits on R&D for intermediate and long range
missiles, and no promise to cease research on a plutonium trigger.

Appeasing a sadistic enemy is pointless. You give an inch, they take a
mile. Appeasement just begets further belligerence. Iran needs to know
that if they don't COMPLETELY end all nuclear weapons research,
sanctions will be so severe that masses will be dying in the streets.
As the madman Saddam Hussein once quite accurately said, "Don't punch a
man in the stomach unless you plan to kill him." Iran knows that
violating even the minimalist terms of the currently proposed "deal"
will invite more sanctions - they will act preemptively to wreak havoc
before we get a chance to retaliate economically. Put simply, that
means yet more Iranian inspired deaths in Europe and the Middle East,
and perhaps here at home.

We have so much more power than Iran, but we lack the will to USE IT.
We can easily break the economic, and thus political back of Iran by
simply shutting them out of most all trade. Riots in the streets from
lack of food and basic services will bring the mullahs down, and have
the IRGC hiding under their beds. We can do this, but we need the
spine. We have to stop being so afraid of Russian friendship with
Iran. Russia is a great power, but at current, even with our atrocious
atrophy of national defense capabilities, we are still more powerful
than the Eastern block, at least at present. We must move quickly, as
the Russia/China axis threatens to exceed our military capabilities
within 5-10 years (much faster if India and Japan joins in, which is
highly likely).

We need a lot more Churchill, and a lot less Chamberlain.

For Peace,

CyberAlert Special Edition Tuesday, July 14, 2015 at 5:20 PM EDT Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996

Read online

http://email.mrc.org/q/1IapkX2z2YDKhF7bhAvDA/wv

MRC.org CyberAlert                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Media Reality Check: "Walloping Walker: The Media's Worst Attacks on the Wisconsin Governor"

Below is the text of a Media Reality Check, compiled Geoffrey Dickens, the MRC's Deputy Research Director, which was posted earlier today.

To read the full Media Reality Check online, posted with videos: http://www.mrc.org/media-reality-check/walloping-walker-medias-worst-attacks-wisconsin-governor

Or, read it on our NewsBusters blog: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2015/07/14/walloping-walker-medias-worst-attacks-wisconsin-governor

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NewsBusted: The green light for conservative laughter! It's two minutes crammed with comedy that will make any conservative laugh. It is featured on our NewsBusters blog or you can watch the latest episodes on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/newsbusted/videos

A new episode went up today with jokes about Hillary Clinton, Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Great Wall of China, Donald Trump, new Terminator movie and selfie sticks.

Direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVnZYW_UHEg

Or, enjoy the episodes on the MRC's own MRCTV: http://www.mrctv.org/channel/newsbusted

Sign up for a weekly e-mail with links to the latest episodes: http://newsbusters.org/newsbustedsignup
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The text of the July 14 Media Reality Check:

Walloping Walker: The Media's Worst Attacks on the Wisconsin Governor

Scott Walker's official entry into the 2016 presidential race has already been met with questions about his sophistication and readiness to be president by the liberal media. The day of Walker's announcement The New York Times' Patrick Healy portrayed the GOP governor as someone who isn't ready for the world stage: "Two words these [Walker] voters do not use about him? 'Smart' and 'sophisticated.'"

Healy added: "A series of early gaffes alarmed party leaders and donors and led Mr. Walker to begin several months of policy tutorials. The collective hope is that Mr. Walker can avoid what Mr. Goeas and other advisers describe as Sarah Palin's problem — becoming a candidate who is initially popular among Republicans, like the 2008 vice-presidential nominee, but loses luster because of missteps as the campaign goes on."

The liberal media first took notice of Walker in 2011, when he took on the public unions to bring some financial stability to Wisconsin. For this he was called a "hooligan" by The Washington Post's Dana Milbank and "un-American" by MSNBC's Joe Scarborough. Scarborough's MSNBC colleague Ed Schultz called his budget "racist," and invited Jesse Jackson to compare him to the segregationist Governor George Wallace. ABC's Diane Sawyer and NBC's Brian Williams compared anti-Walker protests to those against Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak.

Walker has taken shots from the celebrity crowd as well. Stand-up comic Sarah Silverman once tweeted that she wanted to "anally probe" the governor and HBO's Bill Maher compared him to the banjo-playing boy in the movie Deliverance.

The following examples, culled from the MRC's archive, are the worst attacks (so far) on Scott Walker:

# CBS Reporter: Is 'Awkward' Walker Ready for 'Primetime?'

Dean Reynolds: "Awkward exchanges like this have raised questions about his readiness for primetime."
Unidentified reporter: "Are you comfortable with the idea of evolution? Do you believe in it? Do you accept it?"
Scott Walker: "For me I'm going to punt on that one as well."
Reporter: "No. Really?"
Walker: "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other."
Reynolds: "To guard against criticism that he lacks a certain presidential heft, the governor has been undergoing weeks of briefs on global issues, everything from net neutrality to ISIS."
—CBS's Dean Reynolds on CBS This Morning, July 13, 2015.

# Protests Against Walker Just Like Those Against Egyptian Dictator

"Today, we saw America's money trouble meet a reality, a human reality, as teachers, nurses, tens of thousands of state workers took to the streets in this country protesting cuts by the governors, saying to these governors, a promise is a promise. One lawmaker looked out at the crowds gathered in the Wisconsin capital today and said it's like Cairo moved to Madison."
— Anchor Diane Sawyer opening ABC's World News, February 17, 2011.

"From the Mideast to the American Midwest tonight, people are rising up. Citizens' uprisings are changing the world."
— Anchor Brian Williams leading off NBC Nightly News, February 18, 2011.

# Dana Milbank Calls Walker a Hooligan

"'I don't budge,'" Walker promised the fake Koch. He explained that he would increase pressure on state workers by threatening thousands of them with layoffs. He considered planting instigators in the crowd, he said, and he might offer to talk to Democrats - but only as a ruse to get them to return. 'I'm not negotiating,' he said. These are not the words of a statesman. These are the words of a hooligan."
— Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank writing about the content of a phone conversation between Walker and a prankster who pretended to be billionaire David Koch in his February 27, 2011 column.

# Scarborough: Walker's Stand Against Collective Bargaining 'Seems Kind of Un-American To Me'

"I'm going to get killed for saying this." I'm going to get so killed for saying this – I hate to say this, but the concept of telling people that they cannot come together to negotiate with a government – it just kind of seems un-American to me."
— Joe Scarborough on MSNBC's Morning Joe, February 28, 2011.

# Ed Schultz Calls Wisconsin Budget 'Racist'

"Well, I'll say it. This is a racist budget. I mean, anybody with a brain knows that those 82 percent of the kids under the poverty level are never going to go to a private school, and yet the governor wants the parents of those kids to take a portion of their tax dollars and fund private schools. I mean, it is a racist budget. You cannot get around it. It's picking on the poor. It's picking on the inner-city kids. How else can you read it?"
— Ed Schultz in a discussion about school vouchers with Al Sharpton on MSNBC's The Ed Show, March 3, 2011.

# On The Ed Show: Jesse Jackson Compares Scott Walker to Racist Governor George Wallace

ED SCHULTZ: Last night I had chance to see firsthand the enthusiasm for this recall election. Reverend Jesse Jackson rallied hundreds of voters in northwest Milwaukee. He called this election one of the biggest moments in the history of our democracy. He compared it to Emmett Till's lynching and Rosa Parks' refusal to give up her seat. The Reverend also compared Governor Walker to Alabama's governor George Wallace.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
REV. JESSE JACKSON: So now you have a governor -- Wallace did it in Alabama – and now Walker in Wisconsin. Trying to take back access to voting. [inaudible] Protect the basic right to vote!
(END VIDEO CLIP)
...
SCHULTZ: Why did you compare Wisconsin's governor walker to Alabama's segregationist George Wallace?
JACKSON: Well, one has tried to block the vote and lost and Walker is trying to stop the vote and will lose.
— Discussion between Ed Schultz and Jesse Jackson on MSNBC's The Ed Show, June 4, 2012.

# ABC News Says Walker was 'At One Point Was the Most Divisive Politician in America'

MARTHA RADDATZ, SUBSTITUTE HOST: And now Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, a GOP rising star and Tea Party favorite. He made his name taking on unions and is now a possible 2016 contender. Jon Karl is back with the inside story of a man who at one point was the most divisive politician in America.
...
JON KARL: Governor Walker, for a while, you were the most divisive man in America. What'd you learn from that?
— ABC's Martha Raddatz and Jon Karl profile Walker on ABC's This Week, November 17, 2013.

# Rosie O'Donnell Compares Walker to Egyptian Dictator

"I feel like this is the most important issue our nation is facing right now, and has for the last fifty, sixty years...There's apparently over 100,000 people in the freezing cold in Wisconsin standing there, and they have been for the last eleven days? It took seventeen days to get the government in Egypt to stop abusing their citizens after thirty years of rule...I believe the people of Wisconsin were inspired by watching the people of Egypt...stand up to tyranny and dictatorship, a thirty-year dictatorship taken down in seventeen days of peaceful protest. The people in Wisconsin deserve our support...They are us."
— Comedian Rosie O'Donnell on her March 1, 2011 satellite radio show.

# Bill Maher: Was Scott Walker the Banjo Boy in Deliverance?

"Now that Scott Walker has survived his recall, he has to tell us once and for all was he that kid in Deliverance?"
— Bill Maher comparing Walker to the banjo-playing boy in the 1972 movie Deliverance, on HBO's Real Time, June 8, 2012.

# Sarah Silverman: 'I'd Very Much Like to Anally Probe Governor Scott Walker'

"I'd very much like to anally probe @govwalker each time he needs to make an 'informed decision'"
— Sarah Silverman Tweet on July 5, 2013, after Walker signed a new bill requiring women to have an ultrasound before getting an abortion.

Sharpton Avoids Me By Hiding Behind Hannity and O’Reilly by Mychal Massie

Race is the viscous grease Al Sharpton uses to lubricate his flim-flam machine. Adding the "Reverend" moniker affords him cover by having a credible partner, i.e., God, who doesn't want a cut of his ill-gotten gains. And not atypical of race-hucksters, he makes his choices based on what will garner him the most cachet.

He is a craven coward who depends upon the likes of Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly to give him credibility. He avoids those such as myself and Dr. James David Manning like a prostitute avoids police.

I have publicly challenged Sharpton to debate me for several years, I even permitted him to bring help in the form of Marc Morial and Walter Fauntroy. (Fauntroy is now missing having fled the country with his wife with warrants out for his arrest.)
Sharpton doesn't care about right or wrong, innocence or guilt – he cares only that he is able to claim racial prejudice/intolerance as the primary causal factor of whatever cause celebre he stands to cash in on. The fact that the mainstream media present the endozoic Sharpton as a leader of "his" people is an affront to reasonable and cogent minds.

Sharpton is an opportunistic vulture, with nothing in his curriculum vitae that should elevate him above sidewalk minstrel, but to quote the great metaphysician, Don King, "only in America" – to which I add, "Can an Al Sharpton be heralded by the same liberals and mainstream media that curse and belittle Justice Clarence Thomas?"

One of the many things I find so offensive about Sharpton is, unlike Jesse Jackson, there is credible evidence he was actually called to be a preacher. However, the lure of riches and fame has blinded him to the "Truth of Him" he was called to proclaim. We are forced to ask what kind of man, much less a so-called preacher, can praise evil and curse good?

Sharpton masquerades behind a presumed veneer of journalistic integrity based upon his comedy news act on MSNBC. In reality he is chicken manure, race monger who is afraid of his own shadow. He is certainly afraid of me, which was clearly evidenced when he used Sean Hannity to avoid debating me at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. February, 2011.
Image credit "Al Sharpton by David Shankbone" by David Shankbone – David Shankbone. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons – https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al_Sharpton_by_David_Shankbone.jpg#/media/File:Al_Sharpton_by_David_Shankbone.jpg

TAKE ACTION: Every $1 helps The Daily Rant reach 1,000 new readers with this article.          http://mychal-massie.com/premium/sharpton-avoids-me-by-hiding-behind-hannity-and-oreilly/?inf_contact_key=2cbc48e506ec87a26c379e783c8d70ff1b6347940324f79cd609da3b230fb017

On the Road to Serfdom by Roseann Salanitri

Mention slavery to any American and visions of captured Africans shackled in chains and suffering every kind of abuse known to man comes to mind. While this form of slavery is the most severe, there are other forms and degrees by which one might be condemned to bondage.

In western Europe slavery was eventually replaced with serfdom. Serfdom differed from slavery in that it was a voluntary lifetime contract between an individual and a lord that extended into perpetuity. In exchange for the military protection of their lord, and in some cases land to farm, serf's bound themselves and their progeny to oppressive fees and taxation based on the assessed value of their property which they were contractually bound to live forever . Benjamin Franklin understood the concept of sacrificing freedom for protection. He stated, "Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither." The serfs of the feudal system usually found that they had struck a deal with the devil as they often subjected themselves and their families to relying on the protection of their masters in exchange for a hard life of toil and compromised liberty.

Whether it be slavery or serfdom, voluntary or involuntary, the loss of liberty to an elitist of some type requires more than sacrificing monetary advantages or choices about where one can live. First generation serfs sacrificed the very essence of their humanity for themselves as well as their progeny. The Bible has something to say about voluntary slavery – or by extension, serfdom. Galatians 5:1 states: "Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage." A simpler translations states it this way: "Christ has freed us so that we may enjoy the benefits of freedom. Therefore, be firm in this freedom, and don't become slaves again."

Can a free nation that accepts deception and responds with apathy remain free? Have we forgotten that it is a short detour from freedom to serfdom? Again, the Bible has something to say about this. Hosea 4:4 states: "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge I will also reject you from being priest for Me; Because you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children." These are dire words for a nation that has chosen to eroticize its children instead of teaching them sound academics, and a nation that has rejected the truth of God's Word in exchange for Supreme Court decisions. In a free republic, whether it be voluntary or involuntary bondage, the loss of liberty is proceeded by apathy, a disregard for the wisdom of God. These conditions provide the environment for intimidation, fear, and power grabs – all of which have been supported by the tolerated ignorance of the masses.

To make matters worse, the would-be modern day lords understand what the masses have forgotten. They understand that an ignorant people are easily subdued. It is why slaves were not allowed to learn to read. An emancipated slave and renowned scholar, Frederick Douglass said, "Once you learn to read, you will be forever free." He also said: "Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." Those marching on the road to serfdom easily believe the lies of the would-be modern day lords and have no knowledge that even a soft form of bondage does not result in Utopia. This is partially true because the history of such movements have been stricken from the pages of their textbooks, because entitlement mentalities approach critical mass, and because entertainment addictions have dulled the senses to reality.

Furthermore, the would-be modern day lords understand that a people easily intimidated by the politically correct police are easily coerced into surrendering their freedom of conscience along with their freedom of speech. Today we are seeing that these types of serfs would rather remain silent in the face of adversity than risk conflict.

These would-be modern day lords also understand that a controlled media leads to a controlled people, unaware of the dangers that lie ahead and unaware of the hooligans that deceive with sweet talking words and charismatic personalities.

These would-be modern day lords understand that of oppressive taxation and regulation paves the way for compromise, such as is the case for many farmers who have entered into a serf-type of agreement that encumbers the use of their property for them and their progeny in exchange for a meager farmland preservation benefit.

These would-be modern day lords also understand what Hitler understood – that children can easily be separated from the influence of their parents through cleverly disguised curriculum that paints parents as foolish and archaic-thinking fools. And they further understand that this can also be accomplished by giving children license to participate in erotic behavior, and by eradicating the noble history of this nation and leaving in only the hypocrisy of flawed men. This schoolhouse philosophy has been systematically undermining the foundations of this nation, the sacred foundations of the family and the moral fiber they were founded upon. The Bible also has something to say about this. Psalm 11:3 says, "If the foundations are destroyed, What can the righteous do?"

So, what can the righteous do?
First, the righteous must show up. Gone are the days of living peaceful lives safely cocooned in the privacy of your home and church. The righteous must understand that it's time to join together and fight for liberty or lose it forever.

Next, they must refuse to surrender their children's education to the state. This doesn't necessarily mean removing them from government-run schools, which may not be an option. It does mean that they must fill in the gap and educate their children in the areas that have been contorted or are absent from their children's textbooks.

Next, the righteous must do all they can to educate the willfully ignorant. This will take creativity and effort, and it will also take boldness and commitment. It will also take understanding that we cannot educate others if we are not educated ourselves. And this education must extend to properly vetting political candidates as well as the understanding the well-packaged programs that will eventually enslave us – like "Sustainability" and any infringements on our rights secured in the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution.

In conclusion, only an informed and committed remnant of the Most Holy God can derail America from the road to serfdom. But do they have the passion? Do they have the commitment? Or will they submit to a yoke of slavery?

We may have many thoughts about how to stand against tyranny, but we must stand. The words of the former slave, Frederick Douglass, are perhaps the most profound regarding the ongoing battle between liberty and tyranny. He said:

...If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress...

If you care about preserving liberty for yourself and generations to come, you have no other choice: you must engage in the battle. And to be sure, doing nothing is a choice. It is a choice for serfdom.

Image "Bernstorff and Frederick VI" by McLeod – self-made @ National Museum, Copenhagen. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons – https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bernstorff_and_Frederick_VI.JPG#/media/File:Bernstorff_and_Frederick_VI.JPG

TAKE ACTION: Every $1 helps The Daily Rant reach 1,000 new readers with this article.      http://mychal-massie.com/premium/on-the-road-to-serfdom/?inf_contact_key=dc09a5bd23633d7e6a97f87c7f233d3936434e3cae2caec48656d2be211d9806

Is This The Real Homosexual End Game? by Mychal Massie

The old bromide "There are none so blind as those who will not see" is actually a misstating of the scripture verse Jeremiah 5:21: "Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding, who have eyes, and see not, who have ears, and hear not."

I make this point because there are those who A) confuse the idea that Jesus is love, with condoning perversion and debauchery; and B) those who foolishly believe accepting pernicious evil will appease it.

Anyone one who believes homosexuals do not have an end game that has yet to be accomplished "have eyes and see not," and "have ears and hear not." Homosexuals are not after equality; they, not unlike Muslims, are after conquest and just like all terrorists, they have carefully conceived a plan that they've been carrying out by any means available. But unlike Muslim terrorists they are not patient and that may well be their downfall, but I get ahead of myself.

The recent Supreme Court ruling dictated that regardless of one's faith or personal convictions, we must now accept homosexuality. But therein is the bastardization of the truth. The homosexual agenda is not about just forcing America to embrace homosexuality, it is much more insidious than that and your federal government not only knows this they are complicit in this Erebusic agenda.

The following is from the [Homosexual] (I refuse to use the appellation "gay") Manifesto: "Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man."

It further reads: "All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked...We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals...There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled. We shall raise up private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers."

The homosexual agenda has also co-opted the civil rights struggles of blacks for their own extremist anti-family agenda.

In 1987 Guide Magazine, published "the blueprint for the now global homosexual propaganda campaign to replace marriage-based society with a culture of sexual anarchy." (The Overhauling of Straight America; Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill; ppg 1 pg 208; Redeeming the Rainbow) It is the bible of homosexual propagandists. In it the goals and tactics of homosexuals are laid bare.

Amongst other things revealed in this article, homosexuals are directed to: 1) talk about homosexuals and homosexuality as loudly and as often as possible; 2) portray homosexuals as victims, not as aggressive challengers; 3) make homosexuals look good; 4) make [those who oppose homosexual marriage] look bad.

Their agenda further calls for homosexuals to be portrayed favorably in films and television especially daytime television vis-a'-vis soap operas, ad nauseum.

But I argue that all of this is foreplay for what their true end goal is. I believe the evidence and research shows that the lesbians and transgenders are the useful idiots pursuant to the true homosexual agenda. I further believe that their use of the civil rights struggles of blacks was nothing more than an ends to a means.

My contention is that the true homosexual agenda is a nation of male sodomites. If I am right, it is one of the greatest insipid and draconian acts of treachery perpetrated against a civilized society since the beginning of time.

Satan never comes to the table without an end game beyond that which is clearly visible. From my reading of the homosexual manifesto and the "Redeeming of the Rainbow" I have reached the conclusion that the homosexual agenda is 100 percent about homosexual men. It is not about lesbians and the transgendered as such, and it most certainly has nothing to do with concern for blacks, i.e., civil rights.

It is much more sinister than that. I believe the homosexual agenda's secretive end game is a country of homosexuals, not lesbians, and not the transgendered. I believe they are not unlike the mythical "purebred" vampires of celluloid fame, and who look down upon all who are not singularly homosexual.

You don't have to take my word for it. Read their manifesto, the book, and the articles I referenced above in totality and see for yourself.

TAKE ACTION: Every $1 helps The Daily Rant reach 1,000 new readers with this article.          http://mychal-massie.com/premium/is-this-the-real-homosexual-end-game/?inf_contact_key=a30506595f375231016f2ecdb78ff01c654ec1dbb9da8557f4e278c7f26bd9fa

Slaves Had More Dignity Than Blacks Today by Mychal Massie

On July 4, 2014, I was a guest speaker at the Racial Reconciliation and Healing event hosted by Rev. James David Manning of ATLAH Ministries held at Gettysburg Battlefield, in Gettysburg, PA. In the course of my speech, which I gave from the same place President Abraham Lincoln gave his Gettysburg Address, I quoted Booker T. Washington saying: "We went into slavery a piece of property; we came out American citizens. We went into slavery pagans; we came out Christians. We went into slavery without a language; we came out speaking the proud Anglo-Saxon tongue. We went into slavery with slave chains clanking about our wrists; we came out with the American ballot in our hands."
(Address to Hamilton Club, Chicago, 1895)

Are we to believe that blacks today have it harder than those Booker T. Washington referenced or are we supposed to believe he didn't understand the true nature of his situation? My point being, considering the unlimited opportunity blacks have in America today how can anyone ascribe to the debilitating heterodoxy that the white man is impeding black progress.

The transplendent truth encapsulated in those historic words from Booker T. Washington speaks for itself. In the course of my speech, I, like Washington, reminded the attendees gathered on that hallow site, which included persons from India and Great Britain, that if there is to be healing, blacks must realize what they have and what the hand of "Providence" did for them. I know that it is more popular to wallow in apathy and self-victimization, but that is the very antithesis of what "Providence" has provided.

What I had in my speech but did not share, having made the point differently, were the following words from the Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Lincoln January 1, 1863: "And I hereby enjoin upon the people so declared to be free to abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self-defense; and I recommend to them that, in all cases when allowed, they labor faithfully for reasonable wages."

The point here should be obvious: blacks were not freed to become dependents on the government plantation. Quite the opposite.

It is not the white man who has prevented blacks from seizing upon the opportunity available to all. It is the debilitating animus, blame, self-segregation, and self-victimization they wallow in. Those are without question harsh words, but they are not untrue. Booker T. Washington understood the need for blacks to be self-determinative and he understood that the way same was accomplished was by learning a trade and embracing the "God of Providence" for the blessings "He" had bestowed upon them.

But instead, blacks cursed the "God of Providence" as a white man's God and wholistically bought into the message of immiseration.

Lincoln implored blacks in the Emancipation Proclamation that they "abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self-defense." But instead, blacks have elevated the killing of one another to pandemic levels. In Chicago over the same July 4th weekend that I gave my speech, 80 people were shot resulting in 12 fatalities, nearly all of whom were black.

It gets even worse. According to Rich Lowry writing for National Review: "Overall, according to Chicago magazine, the rate of nonfatal gunshot injury in Chicago was 46.5 per 100,000 from 2006 to 2012. But it was only 1.62 per 100,000 for whites. For blacks, it was 112.83 per 100,000. For black males, 239.77, and for black males aged 18–34, 599.65, or 'a staggering one in 200.'" That's one in every 200 black males between the ages of 18-24 being shot. Blacks can hate whites and blame former President George W. Bush, but neither George W. Bush nor white people are roaming the streets and mini-marts murdering black teenagers. It's not whites selling the drugs that are destroying black families and black neighborhoods. It is not whites who are pimping black women drug addicts. It is not whites breaking into black homes. It is their black neighbors and the black hoodlums who look exactly just like them and who live next door to them.

At the time the slaves were set free, Lincoln said in the Emancipation Proclamation: "that in all cases where allowed, [blacks should] labor fruitfully for reasonable wages." The operative words were then and are now "labor fruitfully for reasonable wages." They did not mean then nor do they mean now blacks should become government dependents. Nowhere in the Emancipation Proclamation was it suggested in any way that the government would provide special dispensation based on the skin color of the slaves.

I also said in my speech that day that it was time for whites to get over guilt for that which they are not guilty nor had any part in. I also proffered the question of where anger and resentment of whites has gotten blacks? I asked blacks if they were better off harboring such emotions?

Neither July 4, 1776 nor January 1, 1863 nor June 19, 1865, was Independence Day for the slaves. Independence Day for the Africans brought here as salves was the day they were captured by the Ashanti and Dahomi African tribes (of modern day Benin and Ghana) and sold to Muslims slave traders, who in turn sold them to slave traders doing business in America. Because as I reminded a young man who argued with me pursuant to the importance of racial assignations (for blacks at any rate) based on Marcus Garvey's Back to Africa movement – the legacy of Garvey is Liberia, i.e., economic despair, unimaginable poverty, brutality, disease, ad nauseum.

It is a certainty that blacks, have as did the Irish and others coming to America suffered. But it is equally as true, if not more so for blacks, that they were brought here many long years ago "with the chains clanking about [their] wrists; but [they] came out with the American ballot in [their] hands." Would Oprah Winfrey be a billionaire if her ancestors had stayed in Africa? Who would Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton be shaking down for money if their ancestors had not come here? How many of the inventions and innovations directly attributable to blacks would America and the world enjoy today if African ancestors had not been brought here?

As I closed my speech at Gettysburg on July 4th, I called those in attendance to remembrance that the very grass their feet were standing upon had been grown in the blood-soaked soil of freedom. Something race-mongers would have us forget.

TAKE ACTION: Every $1 helps The Daily Rant reach 1,000 new readers with this article.   http://mychal-massie.com/premium/slaves-had-more-dignity-than-blacks-today/

Come To Me – Sunday Thought For The Day by Mychal Massie

The following was written for July 5, 2015, "Our Daily Bread" by Anne Cetas.
**********************

When Jesus lived on this earth, He invited people to come to Him, and He still does today (John 6:35). But what do He and His Father in heaven have that we need?

Salvation. Jesus is the only way to have forgiveness of sin and the promise of heaven. "Whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life" (John 3:15).

Purpose. We are to give all of our heart, soul, mind, and strength to following Jesus. "Whoever desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me" (Mark 8:34).

Comfort. In trial or sorrow, the "God of all comfort . . . comforts us in all our tribulation" (2 Cor. 1:3-4).

Wisdom. We need wisdom beyond our own for making decisions. "If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, . . . and it will be given to him" (James 1:5).

Strength. When we're weary, "the Lord will give strength to His people" (Ps. 29:11).

Abundant life. The fullest life is found in a relationship with Jesus. "I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly" (John 10:10).

Jesus said, "The one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out" (John 6:37). Come!

How can I grow closer to God today?

Jesus invites us to come to Him for life.

INSIGHT:
The day after Jesus performed the miracle of feeding thousands of people with just five loaves of bread and two fish, the crowd asked Him, "What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you? What will you do? Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written: 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat' " (John 6:30-31 niv). This question is significant because it was the same group of people (or at least part of that group) that Jesus fed the day before who were now asking for a sign. They claimed their ancestors believed because they ate the bread from heaven. They had just seen Jesus miraculously provide bread for them, but they lacked faith to believe Jesus was who He said He was.

READ: John 6:30-40
30 They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work?

31 Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat.

32 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven.

33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.

34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.

35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.

37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.

39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.

40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.                    http://mychal-massie.com/premium/come-to-me-sunday-thought-for-the-day-2/

Thoughts of An Average American

My Fellow Americans,
Tomorrow is July 4th, commonly known as Independence Day here in America. Unfortunately, to those on the left, it has become nothing more than a reflection of our nation's version of Original Sin.
For the Left, Two Hundred and Thirty Nine years ago tomorrow we White Christian Heterosexual Males launched an oppressive campaign on minorities, every minority; Black, Hispanic, Asian, Jew, Muslim, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, Atheist, Brown Eyed, Lisp Speaking, Extra Toed freak to come out of a womb. "WE" have done nothing to create a better life for these people.
600,000 of "US" didn't die for Black Freedom in the Civil War.
"WE" didn't pay $15,000,000.00 for the land "WE" won from Mexico in the Mexican/American War.
"WE" have not allowed religious freedom in this country for 239 years dispite our Anglo Saxon Protestant origins.
"WE" didn't enter a war that had raged for four years and cost the lives of millions of British, French, German, Russian, Japanese and two dozen other nationalities while sacrificing hundreds of thousdands of U.S. lives for their freedom, not once, but twice.
"WE" didn't enter wars in Asia to stop communisim from spreading their oppresive ways on poor people around the world while sacrificing nearly 60,000 of our citizens again, for their freedom.
"WE" didn't go into Afghanistan and Iraq and bring with it the first chance in 500 years for them to have a chance of a free life.
"WE" didn't do any of these things because we hate minorities, the Black, Hispanic, Asian, Jew, Muslim, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, Atheist, Brown Eyed, Lisp Speaking, and any Extra Toed freak to come out of a womb.
But what if we had? What if we had done all those things but we didn't believe Gay Marriage was akin to Heterosexual Marriage? What if we had done all those things but didn't think the Confederate Flag was all that offensive or believed Black Americans to be smart enough to decern the difference in meaning it has today as a defeated ideal vs the meaning it did 150 years ago.
And it's too bad we made it impossible to change any of these horrible wrongs we perpetrated on minorites through stopping them from bringing law suits against those they felt discriminated by. But what if we had not stood in the way and allowed these cases to go all the way to the SCOTUS? What if we had...
If you have not caught on by now "WE" in fact did do all these things listed above. We did die by the millions for the freedom of others, even those we disagreed with, because it was right. One of the reasons you have your "new" rights is because we DID NOT use any "White Priviledge" to stop it because we simply don't have the power you assign to "US".
So maybe, as the sun rises tomorrow and you pull out your rainbow flags and your Black Power banners and your "Black Lives Matter" posters and your "Immigrants Built This Country" T-Shirts, maybe just maybe, you take a moment and get down on one knee and say thank you to those Slave Owning, Bigoted, Bible Thumping Gay Haters who were forward thinking enough to put in the founding documents the means of your "liberation.
But what would I know; I'm just an Average American.
PS: Please Share.

It's Not Guns: It's Big Pharma

by Mychal Massie on July 2, 2015 in Daily Rant 
January 22, 2013, I wrote the following Daily Rant. It was titled "Weapons of Choice." I repost it today and ask you — what has changed? Doctors and government continue to poison our young people and children and when they react to the side effects of their psychotropic drugs they go to gun-free zones and commit amongst other things mass murder. For those who missed this piece the first time here it is again and for those who have read it here's a refresher read. It has been updated.

I remember my friends and I playing army and cowboys and Indians during our recesses in grade school. The sounds of pow-pow-pow rang out from our finger pistols and our imaginary rifles. I smile today as I recall the inevitable spats of "I shot you," and "no you didn't, or "yah but I was only wounded."

Not one of my friends or anyone we knew or heard about grew up to be serial killers or mass murderers – unless you count serving in the various combat zones as being synonymous with same, (the thoughts and perspectives of John Kerry and Jane Fonda notwithstanding).

Growing up, even the girls in my school could handle rifles. Hunting, shooting, reloading, black powder, targets in the back yard, etc., were the norm. I had a beautiful .22 pump rifle until shortly after I graduated, and I would have given anything to have my uncle's 30.06 rifle, but that went to someone else.

We grew up with guns, and there were any number of times our idea of conflict resolution was reduced to a shout, shove, or punch, but it never came to shooting or stabbing one another or anyone else.

There were teachers we absolutely despised and probably still would today if we were to run into them, but there was never, and I mean never, a thought given to taking a gun to school to shoot them and/or a classmate. And many of us had our rifles in our cars so we could go hunting right from school.

War movies and westerns were the norm then, even into our college years. But they never influenced us to the point that we assaulted the public with our readily available weapons.

The one thing we did not have growing up and through our years in school was a phalanx of doctors and psychiatrists dispensing prescriptions for psychotropic drugs like candy from Pez dispensers.

Former Reagan White House advisor, and president and co-founder of the Social Security Institute, Lawrence Hunter writing for Forbes Magazine wrote: "In 2000, New York legislators recognized the ubiquitous and unambiguous connection between violence, especially gun violence and mass murder, and the widespread prescribed use of psychiatric drugs. Senate Bill 7035 was introduced in the New York State Senate that year requiring police agencies to report to the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) on certain crimes and suicides committed by a person who is using psychiatric drugs, including assault, homicide, sex offense, robbery offense, firearms and other dangerous weapons offense, kidnapping and arson." (It's The Drugs Not The Guns; 1/12/13; Forbes.com)

Therein is the 800 pound pink gorilla in the center of the room that everyone especially the anti-gun people refuses to acknowledge.

In his last Facebook post before his highly suspicious death, John Noveske who was one of America's most celebrated battle rifle manufacturers posted the most comprehensive list I've seen to date of children as young as 11 years old to adults aged 37 years who had either committed suicide or mass shootings. The one thing every one of them had in common was that they were on a prescription psychotropic drug or combination of same such as Prozac, Zoloft, Ritalin, Luvox, Paxill, Ambien, and others.

UPDATED TO INCLUDE RECENT MASS SHOOTINGS:

• Eric Harris age 17 (first on Zoloft then Luvox) and Dylan Klebold aged 18 (Columbine school shooting in Littleton, Colorado), killed 12 students and 1 teacher, and wounded 23 others, before killing themselves. Klebold's medical records have never been made available to the public.

• Jeff Weise, age 16, had been prescribed 60 mg/day of Prozac (three times the average starting dose for adults!) when he shot his grandfather, his grandfather's girlfriend and many fellow students at Red Lake, Minnesota. He then shot himself. 10 dead, 12 wounded.

• Cory Baadsgaard, age 16, Wahluke (Washington state) High School, was on Paxil (which caused him to have hallucinations) when he took a rifle to his high school and held 23 classmates hostage. He has no memory of the event.

• Chris Fetters, age 13, killed his favorite aunt while taking Prozac.

• Christopher Pittman, age 12, murdered both his grandparents while taking Zoloft.

• Mathew Miller, age 13, hung himself in his bedroom closet after taking Zoloft for 6 days.

• Kip Kinkel, age 15, (on Prozac and Ritalin) shot his parents while they slept then went to school and opened fire killing 2 classmates and injuring 22 shortly after beginning Prozac treatment.

• Luke Woodham, age 16 (Prozac) killed his mother and then killed two students, wounding six others.

• A boy in Pocatello, ID (Zoloft) in 1998 had a Zoloft-induced seizure that caused an armed stand off at his school.

• Michael Carneal (Ritalin), age 14, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded..

• A young man in Huntsville, Alabama (Ritalin) went psychotic chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.

• Andrew Golden, age 11, (Ritalin) and Mitchell Johnson, aged 14, (Ritalin) shot 15 people, killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others.

• TJ Solomon, age 15, (Ritalin) high school student in Conyers, Georgia opened fire on and wounded six of his class mates.

• Rod Mathews, age 14, (Ritalin) beat a classmate to death with a bat.

• James Wilson, age 19, (various psychiatric drugs) from Breenwood, South Carolina, took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers.

• Elizabeth Bush, age 13, (Paxil) was responsible for a school shooting in Pennsylvania

• Jason Hoffman (Effexor and Celexa) – school shooting in El Cajon, California

• Jarred Viktor, age 15, (Paxil), after five days on Paxil he stabbed his grandmother 61 times.

• Chris Shanahan, age 15 (Paxil) in Rigby, ID who out of the blue killed a woman.

• Jeff Franklin (Prozac and Ritalin), Huntsville, AL, killed his parents as they came home from work using a sledge hammer, hatchet, butcher knife and mechanic's file, then attacked his younger brothers and sister.

• Neal Furrow (Prozac) in LA Jewish school shooting reported to have been court-ordered to be on Prozac along with several other medications.

• Kevin Rider, age 14, was withdrawing from Prozac when he died from a gunshot wound to his head. Initially it was ruled a suicide, but two years later, the investigation into his death was opened as a possible homicide. The prime suspect, also age 14, had been taking Zoloft and other SSRI antidepressants.

• Alex Kim, age 13, hung himself shortly after his Lexapro prescription had been doubled.

• Diane Routhier was prescribed Welbutrin for gallstone problems. Six days later, after suffering many adverse effects of the drug, she shot herself.

• Billy Willkomm, an accomplished wrestler and a University of Florida student, was prescribed Prozac at the age of 17. His family found him dead of suicide – hanging from a tall ladder at the family's Gulf Shore Boulevard home in July 2002.

• Kara Jaye Anne Fuller-Otter, age 12, was on Paxil when she hung herself from a hook in her closet. Kara's parents said ".... the damn doctor wouldn't take her off it and I asked him to when we went in on the second visit. I told him I thought she was having some sort of reaction to Paxil...")

• Gareth Christian, Vancouver, age 18, was on Paxil when he committed suicide in 2002, (Gareth's father could not accept his son's death and killed himself.)

• Julie Woodward, age 17, was on Zoloft when she hung herself in her family's detached garage.

• Matthew Miller was 13 when he saw a psychiatrist because he was having difficulty at school. The psychiatrist gave him samples of Zoloft. Seven days later his mother found him dead, hanging by a belt from a laundry hook in his closet.

• Kurt Danysh, age 18, and on Prozac, killed his father with a shotgun. He is now behind prison bars, and writes letters, trying to warn the world that SSRI drugs can kill.

• Woody __, age 37, committed suicide while in his 5th week of taking Zoloft. Shortly before his death his physician suggested doubling the dose of the drug. He had seen his physician only for insomnia. He had never been depressed, nor did he have any history of any mental illness symptoms.

• A boy from Houston, age 10, shot and killed his father after his Prozac dosage was increased.

• Hammad Memon, age 15, shot and killed a fellow middle school student. He had been diagnosed with ADHD and depression and was taking Zoloft and "other drugs for the conditions."

• Matti Saari, a 22-year-old culinary student, shot and killed 9 students and a teacher, and wounded another student, before killing himself. Saari was taking an SSRI and a benzodiazapine.

• Steven Kazmierczak, age 27, shot and killed five people and wounded 21 others before killing himself in a Northern Illinois University auditorium. According to his girlfriend, he had recently been taking Prozac, Xanax and Ambien. Toxicology results showed that he still had trace amounts of Xanax in his system.

• Finnish gunman Pekka-Eric Auvinen, age 18, had been taking antidepressants before he killed eight people and wounded a dozen more at Jokela High School – then he committed suicide.

• Asa Coon from Cleveland, age 14, shot and wounded four before taking his own life. Court records show Coon was on Trazodone.

• Jon Romano, age 16, on medication for depression, fired a shotgun at a teacher in his New York high school.

Missing from list... 3 of 4 known to have taken these same meds....

• What drugs was Jared Lee Loughner on, age 21...... killed 6 people and injuring 14 others in Tuscon, Az?

• What drugs was James Eagan Holmes on, age 24..... killed 12 people and injuring 59 others in Aurora Colorado?

• What drugs was Jacob Tyler Roberts on, age 22, killed 2 injured 1, Clackamas Or?

• What drugs was Adam Peter Lanza on, age 20, Killed 26 and wounded 2 in Newtown Ct?

http://www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shootings_psychiatric_drugs_antidepressants.html#ixzz3eZuIYsSC

In each case, the extreme mood swings, extreme behavior, and dark places of withdrawal increased in both the children and/or adults the earliest noted by Noveske being in 1998. Noveske's list detailed 39 specific examples. He also listed 3 of 4 recent mass killers who were known to have taken those same medications – nothing is yet known pursuant to what exactly Adam Lanza was taking.

The television advertisements for these drugs include long and detailed potential side affects that range from violent thoughts to thoughts of suicide. And yet they are prescribed like candy.

The preamble to New York Senate Bill 7075 noted above read, in part: "There is a large body of scientific research establishing a connection between violence and suicide and the use of psychotropic drugs in some cases. This research, which has been published in peer reviewed publications such as the American Journal of Psychiatry, and The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and The Journal of Forensic Science, has shown, among other things, that: certain drugs can induce mania (a psychosis which can produce bizarre, grandiose and highly elaborated destructive plans, including mass murder;...and certain drugs can produce an acute psychotic reaction in an individual not previously psychotic."

Hunter continued: "Since that time, there have been at least 12 additional high-profile mass murders linked to the use of psychiatric drugs, about one a year. And [as Noveske also notes] virtually every mass school shooting during the past 15 years, the shooter has been on or in withdrawal from psychiatric drugs."

The New York Bill died in committee. And, as noted above, those taking said drugs have caused people around the world to die.

But rather than take on the giant pharmaceutical companies, Obama, Sarah Brady, and the anti-gun crowd blame guns for the actions of the individuals and do so in the face of incontrovertible evidence to the contrary of their "take their guns" crusade.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media and politically correct editors, publishers, and program producers chant and/or push the fallacious mantra of those who want to deprive people of their Second Amendment rights.

TAKE ACTION: Every $1 helps The Daily Rant reach 1,000 new readers with this article.        http://mychal-massie.com/premium/its-not-guns-its-big-pharma/?inf_contact_key=660ce8b9d3c86c2ea0a555b67c676298a027a5aeacadf800ec5c6d0bbd307204